Loading...
Garmin Forerunner 265 vs Garmin Venu 3
Which product has fewer dealbreakers? Side-by-side risk analysis based on real user complaints.
WINNER
7/10High Risk
Garmin Forerunner 265
High Risk
~$395.00as of Feb 2026
Full ReportCheck Price on Amazon(paid link)
8/10High Risk
Garmin Venu 3
High Risk
~$349.99as of Feb 2026
Full ReportCheck Price on Amazon(paid link)
At a Glance
| Metric | Garmin Forerunner 265 | Garmin Venu 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 7/10 | 8/10 |
| Dealbreakers | 4 | 5 |
| Critical Issues | 2 | 2 |
| Longevity Score | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Resale Value | Med | Med |
| Priceapprox. | ~$395.00 | ~$349.99 |
Dealbreakers Comparison
Garmin Forerunner 265
Overpriced for runners
HIGH severity
Sluggish touchscreen
MED severity
Battery drain with AMOLED
HIGH severity
Clunky music transfer
MED severity
Garmin Venu 3
Overpriced Features
HIGH severity
Poor Voice Assistant
HIGH severity
Limited Garmin Pay
MED severity
False Nap Detection
MED severity
Poor Sunlight Visibility
MED severity
Our Verdict
The Garmin Forerunner 265 and Venu 3 both suffer from being overpriced, but the Forerunner 265’s dealbreakers are more manageable. Its sluggish touchscreen and battery drain with AMOLED are issues, but the Venu 3’s poor voice assistant, false nap detection, and poor sunlight visibility make it harder to recommend. If you prioritize a running watch, the Forerunner 265 is the better choice despite its flaws.
Prices shown are approximate and were last verified on the date indicated. Actual prices may vary. Always check the retailer for the most current pricing. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Full disclosure