Loading...
Loading...
Which product has fewer dealbreakers? Side-by-side risk analysis based on real user complaints.

High Risk
~$177.99as of Feb 2026
Full Report
High Risk
~$176.54as of Feb 2026
Full Report| Metric | Samsung Galaxy Watch FE | Apple Watch SE (2nd Gen) |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Dealbreakers | 4 | 5 |
| Critical Issues | 2 | 2 |
| Longevity Score | 4/10 | 5/10 |
| Resale Value | Low | Med |
| Priceapprox. | ~$177.99 | ~$176.54 |
Outdated Hardware
HIGH severity
Limited Storage
MED severity
Scratch-Prone Screen
MED severity
Inaccurate Health Metrics
HIGH severity
No Always-On Display
HIGH severity
Same Old Chip
MED severity
Missing Health Sensors
HIGH severity
Dim Screen
MED severity
Slow Charging
MED severity
Both the Samsung Galaxy Watch FE and Apple Watch SE (2nd Gen) have significant flaws, but the dealbreakers differ. The Galaxy Watch FE’s outdated hardware and inaccurate health metrics make it unreliable for performance or fitness tracking. The Apple Watch SE lacks modern features like an always-on display and advanced health sensors, but its ecosystem integration remains strong. If you prioritize health tracking accuracy, avoid the Galaxy Watch FE; if you want seamless Apple integration and don’t mind missing features, the Apple Watch SE is the better choice.
Prices shown are approximate and were last verified on the date indicated. Actual prices may vary. Always check the retailer for the most current pricing. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Full disclosure